One day, four fathers occupied the ruler's court and blamed a woman for delivering a heinous act. They demanded that she had committed an obscene connection with a dog. Furious upon trial-specific indictments, the ruler rapidly paged the girl to the court.
When she arrived, she furiously renounced all accusations, declaring, "Your Majesty, I have waited reputable and whole for the past two ages." The ruler, driven to reveal the validity, orderly the royal obstetrician to try her.
The obstetrician waited but conformed to the ruler's order. As she attended the examination, the girl was upset and disapproved, "I be certain Allah, these indictments are dishonest!" However, the midwife persisted in her examination and ultimately saw different marks on the mother’s body. She before uttered, "Your Majesty, this girl is dishonest! These marks desire an unlawful act."
The tribunal erupted upside-down as the ruler, being completely occupied mentally and maddened, doubted the mother further. Despite her continued denials, the ruler waited doubtfully and required, "If you are naive, therefore reason do you seem so reluctant?"
The wife permanently asserted, demanding that the marks on her carcass were precipitated by someone present in the tribunal. At this telling, all eyes curve toward the accusers. The ruler urgently wanted the four men to repeat and noticed their anxious behavior. When he asked if they had deceitfully blamed the woman, they doubted before belatedly conceding that they had slightly periodic what they had got word from another person.
Determined to go into the matter, the ruler required the similarity concerning this concealed informer. Trembling, one of the brothers disclosed that the life was present in court but waited obscure to bureaucracy. The ruler ordered welcome next arrest.
The blamed son was led forward, pale accompanying fear. When questioned, he renounced some misconduct. The ruler, increasingly unable, requested, "If you are innocent, reason do you vibrate before me?" The tribunal slash understood as all counted on the king’s finding.
To guarantee fairness, the ruler orderly a more exhaustive examination of the daughter. The obstetrician was paged occasionally, and then she was captured to the hall chambers for a private evaluation. The pressure in the tribunal evolved as all anticipated the results.
When the obstetrician returned, she was clearly unnerved. She rumored entity to the ruler, leading to welcome expression to dim. He therefore orderly three of the four accusers to leave while custody individual behind for further interrogation.
The ruler questioned the surplus husband, the one who had demanded to have visualized a dog in the wife's house. "What was the color of the dog?" the ruler requested. The man faltered before solving, "Brown."
The second blamed brother was therefore called in and requested the same question. He answered, "Black." The triennial demanded the dog was "White," while the divide into four equal parts insisted it was "Red." At this point, the ruler smirks and orderly welcomes guards to cause the dog into the court.
When the dog was permanently bestowed, it became apparent that it was a join of banner, not equal to one of the fellows’s writings. Their deceit was unprotected.
The ruler counted on the girl and requested the reason she thought the sons had blamed her. She tearfully depicted using what they had badgered her because of her partner's passing. Being a widow, she had lived a quiet and dedicated history. However, these fellows were able frequent advances toward her, that she had rebuffed. Enraged by her refusals, they sought to disgrace her by spreading horrible rumors.
She said that she had before preserved a harmed puppy and cared for it. Seeing this, the husband cruelly falsified a wrongdoing to ruin her prestige.
Faced with accompanying irrefutable evidence, the four sons begin to their knees and request for kindness. "We are blameworthy," they confessed. "We sought to impose upon this girl but abandoned her. In our anger, we wanted revenge by extending lies."
The ruler, offended by their actions, asserted, "There will be no compassion for those the one deceitfully allege a blameless mother!"
As per the law, the four guys were convicted of decease for their misdeed. The villagers, furious by their chicanery, carried out the penalty.
To guarantee fairness further, the ruler organized for the dowager to marry a good male acquaintance or romantic companion, covering all the marriage expenses. He again provided her with accompanying money so she could commit to a secure history.
This occurrence serves as a strong communication of the importance of saving a mother's honor and the harsh results of dishonest allegations. In the end, lawfulness prevailed, and the validity triumphed.